Friday, February 10, 2006
The Hobbit from Rudy
Did anyone else watch My Name is Earl last night and see Randy talking about the hobbit from Rudy? I wish I could remember the whole line because it was truly hilarious.
You know until that moment I never twigged to the fact that Sean Astin was Rudy. I knew, of course, that he was Sam in the Lord of the Rings and that he's now in 24. It is great to see him playing such a different role and showing his range. I was never a huge fan of Rudy but can't believe I forgot who the main actor was.
Thursday, February 9, 2006
In Praise of Ordinary Time
"According to the Catholic liturgical calendar," she explained, "all the days of the year that are not Lent, Easter, Advent, or Christmas are called Ordinary Time. So here we are: Easter is over and Christmas is still a long way off. I guess you could say that this is the time in which we're meant to feel that we have all the time in the world."Are we all snuggling up to our Ordinary Time? That makes it really more special than ordinary, doesn't it?
... Ordinary Time is all those days you do not remember when you look back on your life. Unless, of course, the Virgin Mary came to visit in the middle of it and everything was changed: before and after; then and now; past, present, and future.
Our Lady of the Lost and Foundby Diane Schoemperlen
I like Louise's remark that in other places round the world they are busy anticipating carnival, the celebration of good things before turning to austerity. Time enough for Lent when Lent is upon us (a little prep perhaps the week before is not a bad thing but three weeks ahead?) I'll go for enjoying what I have now. Just in case the Virgin Mary comes to visit and I might miss it by looking ahead too far.
UPDATE:
Yowsa! Barb nails it in the comments ... now why didn't I think of this? That Lent is, in itself, a time of preparation.
I guess the question is, how do we prepare for a Time of Preparation?
Why prepare? Why not just jump in, quiet down and let God show us where He wants us to go during this Lent? What if you come up with some Really Great Spiritual Practice on, say, the Second Sunday of Lent? Do you say it's too late to employ it now, because Lent is underway? Or do you embrace the fact that the Holy Spirit just turned on a lightbulb in your soul?
Tuesday, February 7, 2006
A Bit About Knitting
Or, actually, the raw materials for knitting...
woolgathering\WOOL-gath-uh-ring\ (noun): indulgence in idle daydreaming
In Wales, woolgathering, or gwlana, was a social custom adopted to provide for poorer wives of laborers who did not have access to wool of their own to spin. It involved walking along hedgerows and stone walls and picking off wool that was left behind as the sheep had passed by. Later, after the custom was in little use, woolgathering was considered an unprofitable enterprise. Its practitioners were perceived to wander aimlessly and gained little for their efforts. Hence the association of woolgathering with your mind wandering aimlessly.Merriam-Webster Dictionary
Monday, February 6, 2006
News You Don't Normally Hear From Iraq
From my brother. Thanks John!
Iraqi, U.S. troops aid flood victims in Iraq
February 6, 2006
TIKRIT, Iraq (Army News Service, Feb. 6, 2006) – Iraqi and U.S. Soldiers rescued dozens of people southeast of Mosul Saturday after powerful storms swept through northern Iraq, causing flooding along a Tigris River tributary.
Soldiers from the 3rd Battalion, 2nd Brigade, 2nd Iraqi Army Division used small boats and braved strong currents to rescue nearly 100 people stranded on small islands in the rain-swollen Great Zab River.
Two UH-60 Blackhawk helicopters from the 542nd Medical Company (Air Ambulance) responded to the Ninevah governor’s request for assistance and transported two men stranded on an island that the boats couldn’t reach because of the current. The MEDEVAC crews also dropped off food and drinking water.
Two OH-58 Kiowa helicopters searched the river’s course for additional victims, but none were found, officials said.
(Editor’s note: Information provided by the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) Public Affairs at FOB Speicher.)
A Little Mensa for the Rest of Us
For those of us who thrill to words instead of numbers ...
The names of five people are hidden in the sentence below. Can you find them? (The letters are in consecutive order.)Answer in invisi-script:
Really, a wanted man fleeing from the police who saw a police car looking for him would run and hide.
Al, Ted, Lee, Carl, Nan (Lya is also acceptable.)
I'm Not a Football Expert But ...
... it sure seems to me as if Seattle should have won the Superbowl. There were possibly three and definitely two terrible calls by referees who should have been ashamed to be officiating at that game if that's the best they can do. Not that Seattle didn't blow it themselves a lot by dropping the ball so much.
As for the halftime show we were just plain bored, except when we were just plain horrified by Mick and the gang's time ravaged faces and physiques. Face it guys, old man wobbly arms happen to skinny people too ... you get old and your skin tone goes. Ugh!
Most of the commercials were terrible, especially the Pepsi ads. I know a lot of people liked the FedEx caveman ad but I didn't really care about it. My favorites were the Ameriquest ads (doctor with the defibrillators and the awkward airplane moment), the Clydesdale colt trying to pull the Budweiser wagon (yes, I'm sentimental), and the magic refrigerator. Best recycled idea were the working with monkeys (and jackasses) ads.
As for the halftime show we were just plain bored, except when we were just plain horrified by Mick and the gang's time ravaged faces and physiques. Face it guys, old man wobbly arms happen to skinny people too ... you get old and your skin tone goes. Ugh!
Most of the commercials were terrible, especially the Pepsi ads. I know a lot of people liked the FedEx caveman ad but I didn't really care about it. My favorites were the Ameriquest ads (doctor with the defibrillators and the awkward airplane moment), the Clydesdale colt trying to pull the Budweiser wagon (yes, I'm sentimental), and the magic refrigerator. Best recycled idea were the working with monkeys (and jackasses) ads.
Quick Reviews
Potshot by Robert Parker: One of the Spenser books, the tough guy detective with the heart of a poet. I have read these books for years but had gotten rather tired of the style and so not picked any up for a while. Beginning where I left off, I am finding these a source of light and constant entertainment.
Not Enough Horses by Les Roberts: This is from an earlier series than the Milan Jacovich books I've been reading. I found this Hollywood detective story to be rather predictable. Since I usually read along without trying to solve the mystery it is unusual that I pick up on the murderer and motive halfway through ... but that is what happened with this one. Stick with the Jacovich stories.
Cooking for the Week : Leisurely Weekend Cooking for Easy Weekday Meals: Reteaching us that principle we have forgotten or perhaps never learned at our mothers' knees ... cook a big meal that has the components of different menus throughout the week. This small book looks quite promising and I am going to be following a week's worth of advice to see how it works. We were pleasantly surprised with Caramelized Onions and Carrots this weekend so I am interested to see how the rest of the recipes go together.
These are #13, 14, and 15 of books read in 2006.
Not Enough Horses by Les Roberts: This is from an earlier series than the Milan Jacovich books I've been reading. I found this Hollywood detective story to be rather predictable. Since I usually read along without trying to solve the mystery it is unusual that I pick up on the murderer and motive halfway through ... but that is what happened with this one. Stick with the Jacovich stories.
Cooking for the Week : Leisurely Weekend Cooking for Easy Weekday Meals: Reteaching us that principle we have forgotten or perhaps never learned at our mothers' knees ... cook a big meal that has the components of different menus throughout the week. This small book looks quite promising and I am going to be following a week's worth of advice to see how it works. We were pleasantly surprised with Caramelized Onions and Carrots this weekend so I am interested to see how the rest of the recipes go together.
These are #13, 14, and 15 of books read in 2006.
Friday, February 3, 2006
Are You Ready to Rumble: Evolution (yes, again)
Darwinian evolution is plainly unavailing in this exercise or that era, since Darwinian evolution begins with self-replication, and self-replication is precisely what needs to be explained. But if Darwinian evolution is unavailing, so, too, is chemistry. The fronds comprise "a random ensemble of polynucleotide sequences" (emphasis added); but no principle of organic chemistry suggests that aimless encounters among nucleic acids must lead to a chain capable of self-replication.Just a snippet (that's how long this very long article is) from a Commentary magazine article that I found quite interesting, especially in terms of how difficult, nay impossible, it has been for scientists to pin down the origins of life.
If chemistry is unavailing and Darwin indisposed, what is left as a mechanism? The evolutionary biologist's finest friend: sheer dumb luck.
Was nature lucky? It depends on the payoff and the odds. The payoff is clear: an ancestral form of RNA capable of replication. Without that payoff, there is no life, and obviously, at some point, the payoff paid off. The question is the odds.
For the moment, no one knows how precisely to compute those odds, if only because within the laboratory, no one has conducted an experiment leading to a self-replicating ribozyme. But the minimum length or "sequence" that is needed for a contemporary ribozyme to undertake what the distinguished geochemist Gustaf Arrhenius calls "demonstrated ligase activity" is known. It is roughly 100 nucleotides.
Whereupon, just as one might expect, things blow up very quickly. As Arrhenius notes, there are 4100 or roughly 1060 nucleotide sequences that are 100 nucleotides in length. This is an unfathomably large number. It exceeds the number of atoms contained in the universe, as well as the age of the universe in seconds. If the odds in favor of self-replication are 1 in 1060, no betting man would take them, no matter how attractive the payoff, and neither presumably would nature.
"Solace from the tyranny of nucleotide combinatorials," Arrhenius remarks in discussing this very point, "is sought in the feeling that strict sequence specificity may not be required through all the domains of a functional oligmer, thus making a large number of library items eligible for participation in the construction of the ultimate functional entity." Allow me to translate: why assume that self-replicating sequences are apt to be rare just because they are long? They might have been quite common.
They might well have been. And yet all experience is against it. Why should self-replicating RNA molecules have been common 3.6 billion years ago when they are impossible to discern under laboratory conditions today? No one, for that matter, has ever seen a ribozyme capable of any form of catalytic action that is not very specific in its sequence and thus unlike even closely related sequences. No one has ever seen a ribozyme able to undertake chemical action without a suite of enzymes in attendance. No one has ever seen anything like it.
The odds, then, are daunting; and when considered realistically, they are even worse than this already alarming account might suggest. The discovery of a single molecule with the power to initiate replication would hardly be sufficient to establish replication. What template would it replicate against? We need, in other words, at least two, causing the odds of their joint discovery to increase from 1 to 1060 to 1 in 10120. Those two sequences would have been needed in roughly the same place. And at the same time. And organized in such a way as to favor base pairing. And somehow held in place. And buffered against competing reactions. And productive enough so that their duplicates would not at once vanish in the soundless sea.
In contemplating the discovery by chance of two RNA sequences a mere 40 nucleotides in length, Joyce and Orgel concluded that the requisite "library" would require 1048 possible sequences. Given the weight of RNA, they observed gloomily, the relevant sample space would exceed the mass of the earth. And this is the same Leslie Orgel, it will be remembered, who observed that "it was almost certain that there once was an RNA world."
To the accumulating agenda of assumptions, then, let us add two more: that without enzymes, nucleotides were somehow formed into chains, and that by means we cannot duplicate in the laboratory, a pre-biotic molecule discovered how to reproduce itself.
Again, I will comment that I don't have any particular problem with evolutionary theory except for the part where complete chance and mutation are put forward as fact. In fact, this is a philosophical approach, very much like that of ID proponents. Neither is provable ... or has been to date at any rate as far as I know.
It is long but worth it if you are interested in the subject. Do go read the entire article.
UPDATE
I have had a heckuva time with those darned numbers.Thanks to Dr. Thursday for helping me and any errors are mine alone.
More Tough Guy Stuff
COLLISION BEND by Les Roberts
Another Milan Jacovich mystery has him detecting the murder of a local television news reporter at the behest of a former girlfriend in order to clear her current boyfriend. I guessed who done it but not how or why ... and it was another good page turner from Roberts. The series is recommended as a nice escape from reality following the tough detective with the heart of gold.
This is #12 of books read in 2006.
Another Milan Jacovich mystery has him detecting the murder of a local television news reporter at the behest of a former girlfriend in order to clear her current boyfriend. I guessed who done it but not how or why ... and it was another good page turner from Roberts. The series is recommended as a nice escape from reality following the tough detective with the heart of gold.
This is #12 of books read in 2006.
Thursday, February 2, 2006
The Manolo, He Says What The Happy Catholic Is Thinking
Manolo says, undoubtedly, the world it would be the much more super fantastic place if the Manolo actually did have the police powers.On another blog someone mentioned that if there are no rules on the dress code, then no one should have taken it upon themselves to make up their own ... because you can't fairly accuse someone for breaking a rule that doesn't exist.
The first law to be strenuously enforced? One must dress appropriately for the occasion.
Under no conceivable circumstance should one wear the slogan-bearing t-shirt to the Statement of the Union Speech. And, if you are silly enough to do this, you deserve to be led out in shame to the Capitol Rotunda where the gay-but-fashion-challenged Fab Five they will publicly make you over into the ridiculous metrosexual. This they should do even if you are the woman.
Trust the Manolo, wearing the political t-shirt to the formal ceremonial event, it does nothing for your cause. Indeed, the trivality of such attire, it perhaps even undermines the seriousness of your position.
P.S. By the way, the Manolo he has already addressed the issue of what is the appropriate feetwear to wear to the ceremonial events.
When I read that I thought that anyone with half a brain (and this includes the Republican chick who was tossed also for t-shirt wear) knows that you dress formally for an occasion of this importance. This is what mothers have drilled into their children's heads for time immemorial. They are called "unspoken" rules because everyone knows them.
Yeah, those brazen t-shirt wearers should have been turned away at the door instead of later, when no doubt someone with all of his or her brain spotted what was going. But let's get real. Dressing down for the State of the Union Address is bad form no matter what your message.
As the Manolo wisely points out to us.
Bleg
From an email of a reader who wants to recommend a parish to someone ... I know we discussed this once before but can't for the life of me remember the answers or find the thread. Any help is appreciated.
Do you know any sensible solid good Catholic parishes in the North Dallas area?There is, of course, my own church, St. Thomas Aquinas. I know that St. Anne's in Coppel is also good. Any others to recommend?
Are We Feeling Smart Yet?
Another Mensa puzzle ... for those who don't experience brain freeze at the sight of numbers.
Start with the number of Apostles in the Bible, subtract the cube of 2, add the number of Greek Fates, then add the number of the winds, in popular parlance.Answer below in clever, invisi-script (highlight with cursor to read).
What number do you get?
11 (12 - 8 = 4 + 3 = 7 + 4)
Wednesday, February 1, 2006
Pope Benedict Explains Deus Caritas Est
Catholic Outsider has translated a letter that the Pope wrote for the readers of the Italian magazine “Famiglia Cristiana” explaining the encyclical.
Here we find two questions: Can’t the Church leave this service to so many other philanthropic organizations?Really good ... and much easier to read than I found that encyclical, by the way. Go read it.
This is the answer: No, the Church cannot do that. She has to practice love for the neighbor also as a community, otherwise she will announce the God of love in an incomplete and insufficient way...
Free Will, the Theology of Prosperity and the Temptation of Jesus
You wouldn't think that our last prayer group meeting with Fr. L. would have covered such broad ground ... but then y'all don't know Fr. L. He's a wide ranging thinker.
There is no way I can do our discussion justice but I will put a few of the "holy 2x4" moments I had when we were talking about the upcoming readings for next Sunday.
However, Fr. L. drew us into a discussion of free will and predestination after saying that the very short take on Job is "why do bad things happen to good people?" Is it random? Is it because God is smiting you? Does God have a plan for your life? If so, just how specifically does He work in our daily lives? Well, of course, there's no concrete, provable answer to that. It is all opinion and interpretation depending on many factors in each person's viewpoint.
I realized that one of the reasons I have never really taken to Job's story is that, in many ways, it is like reading a blog with too many arguing commenters. Everyone spends a lot of time fervently advancing their arguments but there often is no concrete answer because the question is too theoretical (or theological in the case of St. Blog's which quite often is the same thing). It is a lot of sound and fury signifying nothing. And that is basically what we are left with in the end of Job ... as life and God are mysteries that none of us can truly comprehend.
The big revelation for me was when Fr. L. pointed out that Job and his friends are, at least in part, arguing from the basis that all good things come from God who rewards you for your righteousness. So when those good things are taken away, you must have done something wrong. That is a way of thinking that is all too easy for any of us to fall into in daily life, much less when total disaster hits as it did for Job. What we forget is that all good things come from God and we are not owed any of them. Which all made for an interesting discussion.
The big "aha" was when Fr. L. asked if anyone saw the possiblity of a "subtle temptation" of Jesus in this story. He pointed out that in St. Luke's gospel, after Jesus has been tempted in the desert, St. Luke says that the devil left him for a while. Which leads to the inference that Jesus was tempted more later.
Basically, without a solid grounding in prayer, in God's will for him, it would have been so easy for Jesus to go back with the disciples to the people of the town who were waiting for him as if he were a rock star. He could have settled down and been the "god" of the town and made everyone come to him. They'd have fed him, he'd have looked out for them. These are temptations which come from the human spirit just as easily as from the devil. It is a reflection of Jesus' wholly human nature to think about how that temptation would have been there for him.
But Jesus never settled. He never took the easy way out (as we know all too well). He always went to the people instead of making them find their ways to him.
All of the above leads to some big questions for our lives which are easy to keep mulling over through the rest of the week. How are we grounded? In what do we place our trust? What has to be taken away from us before we question God? Do we settle?
There is no way I can do our discussion justice but I will put a few of the "holy 2x4" moments I had when we were talking about the upcoming readings for next Sunday.
Reading IOf course, there was the obvious conversation about extreme depression that anyone would be likely to suffer when losing one's home, business, children, health ... and after having your friends come and beat on you for a while.
Jb 7:1-4, 6-7
Job spoke, saying:
Is not man's life on earth a drudgery?
Are not his days those of hirelings?
He is a slave who longs for the shade,
a hireling who waits for his wages.
So I have been assigned months of misery,
and troubled nights have been allotted to me.
If in bed I say, "When shall I arise?"
then the night drags on;
I am filled with restlessness until the dawn.
My days are swifter than a weaver's shuttle;
they come to an end without hope.
Remember that my life is like the wind;
I shall not see happiness again.
However, Fr. L. drew us into a discussion of free will and predestination after saying that the very short take on Job is "why do bad things happen to good people?" Is it random? Is it because God is smiting you? Does God have a plan for your life? If so, just how specifically does He work in our daily lives? Well, of course, there's no concrete, provable answer to that. It is all opinion and interpretation depending on many factors in each person's viewpoint.
I realized that one of the reasons I have never really taken to Job's story is that, in many ways, it is like reading a blog with too many arguing commenters. Everyone spends a lot of time fervently advancing their arguments but there often is no concrete answer because the question is too theoretical (or theological in the case of St. Blog's which quite often is the same thing). It is a lot of sound and fury signifying nothing. And that is basically what we are left with in the end of Job ... as life and God are mysteries that none of us can truly comprehend.
The big revelation for me was when Fr. L. pointed out that Job and his friends are, at least in part, arguing from the basis that all good things come from God who rewards you for your righteousness. So when those good things are taken away, you must have done something wrong. That is a way of thinking that is all too easy for any of us to fall into in daily life, much less when total disaster hits as it did for Job. What we forget is that all good things come from God and we are not owed any of them. Which all made for an interesting discussion.
GospelA couple of things here. First, is the way this story fits the "miracle story" format (which I had never thought about ever). When Jesus heals someone it is instantaneous and absolute. Simon's MIL doesn't just start feeling a bit better. She hops up and starts working away serving everyone.
Mk 1:29-39
On leaving the synagogue
Jesus entered the house of Simon and Andrew with James and John.
Simon's mother-in-law lay sick with a fever.
They immediately told him about her.
He approached, grasped her hand, and helped her up.
Then the fever left her and she waited on them.
When it was evening, after sunset,
they brought to him all who were ill or possessed by demons.
The whole town was gathered at the door.
He cured many who were sick with various diseases,
and he drove out many demons,
not permitting them to speak because they knew him.
Rising very early before dawn, he left
and went off to a deserted place, where he prayed.
Simon and those who were with him pursued him
and on finding him said, "Everyone is looking for you."
He told them, "Let us go on to the nearby villages
that I may preach there also.
For this purpose have I come."
So he went into their synagogues,
preaching and driving out demons throughout the whole of Galilee.
The big "aha" was when Fr. L. asked if anyone saw the possiblity of a "subtle temptation" of Jesus in this story. He pointed out that in St. Luke's gospel, after Jesus has been tempted in the desert, St. Luke says that the devil left him for a while. Which leads to the inference that Jesus was tempted more later.
Basically, without a solid grounding in prayer, in God's will for him, it would have been so easy for Jesus to go back with the disciples to the people of the town who were waiting for him as if he were a rock star. He could have settled down and been the "god" of the town and made everyone come to him. They'd have fed him, he'd have looked out for them. These are temptations which come from the human spirit just as easily as from the devil. It is a reflection of Jesus' wholly human nature to think about how that temptation would have been there for him.
But Jesus never settled. He never took the easy way out (as we know all too well). He always went to the people instead of making them find their ways to him.
All of the above leads to some big questions for our lives which are easy to keep mulling over through the rest of the week. How are we grounded? In what do we place our trust? What has to be taken away from us before we question God? Do we settle?
Just In Case Anyone Thought That Catholic Schooling Makes Kids Any Holier Than Anyone Else
This was prominently featured in the latest Bishop Lynch newsletter for parents and students.
Also, don't ya think that sometimes these Catholic school kids must be much, much stupider than other kids? Even waaaay back in my day it was a given that if kids were gonna drink, the last place to go was a school dance ... because they wouldn't turn a blind eye (as I have heard that some parents do).
CHANGES IN PROCEDURES FOR ADMITTANCE TO SCHOOL DANCESIt comes down to the parents y'all ... THE PARENTS! (i can't possibly scream that loud enough!)
The administration and staff of Bishop Lynch are very concerned that some students arrive at school dances under the influence of alcohol, posing a serious safety risk to themselves and to others. In an effort to ensure the safety and well-being of students, the following procedures will be instituted beginning with the upcoming Sadie Hawkins Dance, and will remain in effect for subsequent school sponsored dances:
- Students must arrive to school dances by 9:00 PM in order to be admitted to the dance. Please note that this is a change from the previous time of 10:00. Students arriving after 9:00 pm will not be admitted to the dance.
- Before admission to the dance, all students will be required to breathe into a portable breathalyzer. We do not wish to single out any particular student or group of students, and the only way to be fair to everyone is to test all students. The type of breathalyzer we are using will not require the students to place their mouths on the device; rather they will be breathing in close proximity to the device. Five breathalyzers will be in use at check in, and the time needed to test each student is approximately five seconds.
- If a student tests positive indicating the consumption of alcohol, (1) the parent or guardian will be notified to come to the school and transport the student home; and (2) the student will be subject to consequences pursuant to the Bishop Lynch High School Student Handbook.
We have shared this information with students at school and we encourage you to discuss it with your student at home. We appreciate your support of our efforts to ensure the safety of all students and a positive environment for all at school dances.
Also, don't ya think that sometimes these Catholic school kids must be much, much stupider than other kids? Even waaaay back in my day it was a given that if kids were gonna drink, the last place to go was a school dance ... because they wouldn't turn a blind eye (as I have heard that some parents do).
Resource Spotlight: Gettin' Jiggy With It
MANDARIN DESIGN
This web and blog design studio generously shares tip after tip about how to personalize your blog or web site. You could spend hours looking through this site and, indeed, I have wasted my fair share of time here. Colors, type styles, drop caps, banners, pull quotes, and more are just a few of the things you can learn here. To be fair, I haven't really used any of their tips due to lack of time, however, don't let that stop you from showing more initiative than I have. Get in there and find the perfect way to show your personality.
This web and blog design studio generously shares tip after tip about how to personalize your blog or web site. You could spend hours looking through this site and, indeed, I have wasted my fair share of time here. Colors, type styles, drop caps, banners, pull quotes, and more are just a few of the things you can learn here. To be fair, I haven't really used any of their tips due to lack of time, however, don't let that stop you from showing more initiative than I have. Get in there and find the perfect way to show your personality.
Bonus: they have images you can use without permission.
Tuesday, January 31, 2006
Put Your Thinking Cap On
It's time for another round of guess the Mensa puzzle (provided by Rose's amazing Mensa Puzzle Calendar).
HERE'S THE ANSWER
(in cleverly done "invisi-type" ... highlight it with your cursor to read ... rereading I discovered a typo so those who did the puzzle before I fixed it will have to add 16 to the final answer ... sorry!)
Charlie went out to buy some tools. He spent half of the original amount plus $10 for a drill, half of what was left plus $4 for a sander, then half of what was left plus $2, leaving him with $6.I knew they were going to ask that question. I'll be lying down with a cool cloth on my head if anyone needs me...
How much did he start with?
HERE'S THE ANSWER
(in cleverly done "invisi-type" ... highlight it with your cursor to read ... rereading I discovered a typo so those who did the puzzle before I fixed it will have to add 16 to the final answer ... sorry!)
$100 ($50 + $10= $60, leaving $40; $20 = $4 = $24, leaving $16; $8 + $2 = $10, leaving $6)
OH ... get me some ice someone ...
'CUZ THAT BURNS!
I'm taking quite a beating on my admission of finding JPII's writing much easier to read than that of B-16.
Is there no one out there who joins me in this clearly more sane choice? No one who will come forward to defend the beleaguered Happy Catholic?
The really funny part of all this is that I much prefer Pope Benedict's personal style over that of John Paul II ... LOVE both of them ... but I just relate to B-16 more. Which I think is also opposite to many people's feelings.
Ah well ... there's gotta be someone who plays devil's advocate.
Bring it.
Update: I must stress this is all good natured mockery or astonishment at my lack of discernment.
I'm taking quite a beating on my admission of finding JPII's writing much easier to read than that of B-16.
Is there no one out there who joins me in this clearly more sane choice? No one who will come forward to defend the beleaguered Happy Catholic?
The really funny part of all this is that I much prefer Pope Benedict's personal style over that of John Paul II ... LOVE both of them ... but I just relate to B-16 more. Which I think is also opposite to many people's feelings.
Ah well ... there's gotta be someone who plays devil's advocate.
Bring it.
Update: I must stress this is all good natured mockery or astonishment at my lack of discernment.
2006 Catholic Blog Awards Nominations Are Open
It's time to nominate your favorite Catholic blogs for the 2006 Awards. I have several favorites that I've been waiting for some time to nominate.
Take a gander at the categories, think about your "must read" blogs and take a minute to nominate them. Being nominated is a real tribute and a nice way to give your favorite bloggers a pat on the back.
A complete list of nominees will be posted on Friday, February 3.
Voting for the categories will begin Tuesday, Feb. 7 at Noon CST and Continue through Feb. 13 at Noon CST.
Much thanks to Joshua R. LeBlanc of cyberCatholic.com for holding these awards.
Take a gander at the categories, think about your "must read" blogs and take a minute to nominate them. Being nominated is a real tribute and a nice way to give your favorite bloggers a pat on the back.
A complete list of nominees will be posted on Friday, February 3.
Voting for the categories will begin Tuesday, Feb. 7 at Noon CST and Continue through Feb. 13 at Noon CST.
Much thanks to Joshua R. LeBlanc of cyberCatholic.com for holding these awards.
Monday, January 30, 2006
I Finally Read Deus Caritas Est
Unlike many Catholic bloggers, I always have found John Paul II's writing to be much easier to read than Benedict XVI's. When I read the encyclical about the rosary, I sped through it and read it twice more just because I loved it so much. That set me upon a session of looking for other encyclicals to read, which was most enlightening.
There is just something about Benedict's style that leaves me feeling as if I have been reading a rather plodding textbook. This is not really a reflection on the Holy Father's writing as much as it displays my own tastes and lack of depth. I find that I really relate to his off the cuff comments so much more than his written reflections.
I was sorry to find that this encyclical was no exception.
It is definitely good, definitely much needed ... this look at divine love and it's manifestation within us and in our lives. However, mostly I struggled as I read it, and did not get interested until the very end when Benedict was talking about the saints and Mary. As much as I love B-16, obviously we don't "click" when he is in writing. Pity. But there you have it.
Here is a bit of something that did set me "on fire."
There is just something about Benedict's style that leaves me feeling as if I have been reading a rather plodding textbook. This is not really a reflection on the Holy Father's writing as much as it displays my own tastes and lack of depth. I find that I really relate to his off the cuff comments so much more than his written reflections.
I was sorry to find that this encyclical was no exception.
It is definitely good, definitely much needed ... this look at divine love and it's manifestation within us and in our lives. However, mostly I struggled as I read it, and did not get interested until the very end when Benedict was talking about the saints and Mary. As much as I love B-16, obviously we don't "click" when he is in writing. Pity. But there you have it.
Here is a bit of something that did set me "on fire."
Mary is a woman of hope: only because she believes in God's promises and awaits the salvation of Israel, can the angel visit her and call her to the decisive service of these promises. Mary is a woman of faith: "Blessed are you who believed", Elizabeth says to her (cf. Lk 1:45). The Magnificat--a portrait, so to speak, of her soul--is entirely woven from threads of Holy Scripture, threads drawn from the Word of God. Here we see how completely at home Mary is with the Word of God, with ease she moves in and out of it. She speaks and thinks with the Word of God; the Word of God becomes her word, and her word issues from the Word of God. Here we see how her thoughts are attuned to the thoughts of God, how her will is one with the will of God. Since Mary is completely imbued with the Word of God, she is able to become the Mother of the Word Incarnate.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)