tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881054.post7688169483794241885..comments2024-03-27T09:50:53.662-05:00Comments on Happy Catholic*: Of Encyclicals, Formatting, and KerflufflesJulie D.http://www.blogger.com/profile/08384291674560438678noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881054.post-13297255184603817112013-07-11T08:17:11.850-05:002013-07-11T08:17:11.850-05:00Ahhh, that is an answer which spreads light and no...Ahhh, that is an answer which spreads light and not heat ... which in retrospect I was not sure my piece did. So I really appreciate your calm sense. Excellent points and ... yes ... prayer in all things. :-)Julie D.https://www.blogger.com/profile/08384291674560438678noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6881054.post-55180154272139473372013-07-11T05:53:16.880-05:002013-07-11T05:53:16.880-05:00I think part of the reason is US legislation. You ...I think part of the reason is US legislation. You will lose copyright on a piece if you do not defend it. I think the USCCB has no choice there.<br /><br />BUT, that shouldn't prevent them from being creative with the rules. It shouldn't be too hard to figure something out like USCCB giving out licenses to certain third parties allowing them to redistribute.<br /><br />The thing is that for this, you need to be comfortable with thinking outside the box. It seems like USCCB can't do that because the current bishops are still a product of a time where thinking outside the box was discouraged. The modern generation, at the other hand, does that all the time, which makes cooperation frustating beyond relief.<br /><br />It's hard to solve this in a quick way. I pray for the guidance of the Holy Spirit in the mean time, that He may help the bishops making the transition to the 21st age.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com